On an inexpensive, low-end motherboard utilizing an ALC892 audio system, these are the analog sounds heard through headphones when moving the mouse.
Dragging windows. Selecting portions of an image in GIMP. Moving the mouse cursor. Every time the wired USB mouse moves, electronic interference is heard in the form of annoying beeps and buzzes.
Would a dedicated sound card improve the existing motherboard audio? I was immensely impressed with the superior audio quality of the Asus Xonar DX sound card, so I thought I would try a lower-priced version: the Asus Xonar DSX sound card.
Here are my results with Linux Mint 18.
Why Not Use Another Xonar DX?
Price. The Xonar DX costs more, and since the purpose is to improve the audio on a low-end motherboard, it seemed worthwhile to save money by using a lower-cost sound card.
In addition, the Xonar DX was not available at the time of purchase, so the Xonar DSX sounded appealing. The DSX sports similar specifications to the DX but with lower numbers. It is still a 192kHz 24-bit card with a high SNR.
One advantage over the DX is the replaceable operation amplifier integrated circuit (op-amp) for sound customization. This sounds more like a gimmick than a practical audio enthusiast option, but I wanted to try it out for myself.
Asus Xonar DSX
Does the DSX Work with Linux?
Yes! I only tried Linux Mint 18, and the DSX was 100% plug-and-play compatible. No need for a separate driver download and installation. The DSX worked perfectly out of the box with Linux.
Multi-channel audio also worked. However, the custom control software that enables special effects only available in the Windows software.
Let There Be Sound!
Sound quality is good. In fact, it is every bit as good as advertised. Music and any form of audio sounds clear and clean, and the card plays back 24-bit, 192kHz FLAC music without problems. (If using Linux, you will need to perform a few adjustments to allow this.)
Linux Mint 18 recognized the sound card immediately as CMI8788.
The audio device you select is important since that determines which audio jacks are in use. Digital Output is for the optical connection. Analog Output and Headphones are related, but different.
Both share the same Front output jack, but they will sound different. If Headphones is chosen, then you are limited to stereo output that sound louder. If Analog Output is chosen, then you can select multi-channel audio.
Take note of which output profile is chosen when using Analog Output. Music will sound different since different audio channels will be routed to different jacks.
Headphones was too loud and flat for my tastes. Since I am using an external amplifier, this is not needed. I wanted plain line-out stereo, so I used Analog Output with the 4.0 output profile. This produced very good stereo results.
For best control, I recommend installing gnome-alsamixer.
sudo apt-get install gnome-alsamixer
Unlike the Xonar DX, I did not need to adjust the master volume of the DSX before hearing sufficient audio levels.
From the command line, alsamixer also works.
After configuration, the Xonar DSX will output the bitrate and sampling rate of the source music files.
By default, media players, such as Audacious and VLC, will probably use PulseAudio, which resamples the audio. For configuration details about playing back files at their native bitrates and sampling rates, please see the Xonar DX article. The procedure is identical.
Analog sound is used throughout.
I also tried this card in Windows 7 using a different motherboard that had an ALC1150 audio system. I tried to benchmark the DSX using RMAA (RightMark Audio Analyzer), but I had no success. For some reason, RMAA would always return clipping errors during the benchmark, and the resulting numbers would be horribly low and conflicting.
So, I tried a different testing method: How well does it sound to my ears? I connected an external amplifier, turned the volume up to maximum level, and listened to the silence using earphones. Did I hear any background hiss or noise? Was it silent? Any EMI?
No music or sound played when listening for noise, hiss, and silence, which was important!
I performed this test also with the ALC892, ALC1150, and Xonar DX for comparison. Here are my finds:
Xonar DSX vs. ALC892
Significant improvement. Music definitely sounds cleaner and clearer with the Xonar DSX than with the on-board ALC892 audio system.
Hiss and Noise
Still present, but less audible than the ALC892. The ALC892 background noise and hiss is loud and sounds like a waterfall. Even at 50% volume, the ALC892 noise is heard, and it can even be heard (slightly) during music playback.
With the DSX, background noise and hiss is still present. No, this is not the amplifier. The amplifier is noise-free even at maximum volume. The DSX still has background noise and hiss at high levels, but not as much as the ALC892.
On the ALC892 motherboard, mouse movements can be heard through the earphones at higher listening levels. In fact, the EMI noise can be heard slightly during music playback, which is annoying if you know what to listen for — and once you hear it, you will continue to hear it.
I think the EMI is more of an issue with the motherboard. Only the Xonar DX practically eliminates the EMI beeping.
Xonar DSX vs. ALC1150
Honestly, I could not hear a difference. The DSX sounded just as good as the ALC1150. The DSX was tested in a system with a higher-end ALC1150 motherboard, which already sounded good.
Hiss and Noise
The DSX still had slight hiss, but so did the ALC1150 at max volume. However, hiss and noise levels are faint, and you would need to turn the volume up to maximum in order to hear them. At normal listening levels, hiss and noise are nonexistent most of the time, but careful listening at certain levels do reveal hiss and noise during music playback.
None. Neither for the DSX or the ALC1150. This is a different motherboard without that issue.
Xonar DSX vs. Xonar DX: Which is Better?
The Asus Xonar DX is the definite winner. It is not even a contest. The Xonar DX is the superior sound card in every way.
Both the DSX and the DX play back sound with clarity, but the DX plays sound with ZERO noise. Noise, despite being faint, is still audible with the DSX. The DX sounds significantly better than the ALC892, but only slightly better than the ALC1150 on a quality motherboard.
Hiss and Noise
The Xonar DX produces no noise at max volume, while the Xonar DSX produces faint noise and hiss. The DX is clearly made from better components.
None except when used on the ALC892 motherboard. The DSX still produces EMI beeping even if it is fainter than the ALC892, but the Xonar DX eliminates the EMI beeping completely. Maybe I could hear faint, faint, extremely faint EMI beeping on the ALC892 motherboard when using the Xonar DX on it…not sure. Regardless, the Xonar DX was much better at silencing unwanted EMI, background hiss, and noise on the ALC892 board than the Xonar DSX, which still produced noise.
Xonar DX > (Xonar DSX = ALC1150) > ALC892
Where > means “better than,” and = means “equal to.”
Did the Beeping Disappear?
Recall the opening Beep, beep, beep? One purpose of obtaining this card was to eliminate that noise. It had no effect. The mouse EMI was still present, but not as loud as the ALC892.
I muted all line and mic inputs from all of the software mixers that I could find. While this helped a little, the EMI beeping still occurred.
Why Not Use an Audio Isolator?
If connecting the DSX, DX, motherboard audio, or any other sound card to external audio equipment using the analog outputs from the computer, always use an audio isolator, such as the Mpow ground loop isolator.
For the tests above, I used a direct connection and also a test using the audio isolator. There was no difference in hiss and noise generated by the sound card. The isolator prevents ground loop noise and other computer-generated noise. It did not remove the EMI beeping noises generated from the ALC892 motherboard.
If connecting multiple analog outputs from different computers to external audio gear, isolators are a must. Be aware that these are wonderful devices for cleaning up audio signals, but they will not magically erase hiss and background noise from sound cards or motherboard audio that produce low-quality sound. The sound heard will only be as good as the source.
What About the Op-Amp?
There is one 8-pin DIP socket located on the DSX that lets you replace the existing NE5532P op-amp with a different type in order to customize the sound signature the card produces.
Lacking extra op-amps, I was unable to test this feature. The card includes a Texas Instruments NE5532P.
Knowing what I know now about the differences between the Xonar DX and the Xonar DSX, I would have chosen another Xonar DX even though the DX is the more expensive sound card. Apparently, you get what you pay for.
The Xonar DSX is still a good sound card, and it is a much needed improvement over the ALC892. The entire goal was to produce better audio for an inexpensive system that utilized the ALC892 sound system, and the Xonar DSX filled that goal well. The only problem is that after hearing the pure silence that the Xonar DX is capable of, I prefer the Xonar DX over the DSX.
The Xonar DX boasts a higher SNR than the DSX, and, from my listening tests, the small difference in SNR numbers (107dB for DSX vs. 116dB for DX) makes a tremendous difference in real life.
Is the Asus Xonar DSX a bad sound card? Not at all. It can produce some pleasing sound from low bass to high trebles with minimal noise. Others might experience different results. On my hardware with what I had available, the Xonar DSX sounded good, but the Xonar DX sounded better. Much better.
Those looking to improve the audio on Linux systems should be pleased with the Xonar DSX (and jubilant with the Xonar DX). Excellent Linux compatibility and hassle-free operation are worth the price.